RIA comparison · SEC Form ADV
Apella Wealth vs Bradley Foster & Sargent Inc
Two independent wealth managers side by side: assets, clients, staff, services and fees, from each firm’s own filing.
The short answer
Apella Wealth is the larger of the two, with $11B in regulatory assets to $9.1B at Bradley Foster & Sargent Inc, 22% more than its rival, by their latest Form ADV filings. Apella Wealth reports more individual clients (8,139 vs 1,840), while Bradley Foster & Sargent Inc’s clients hold more on average (about $4.4 million each against $1.3 million). Both are based in Connecticut: Apella Wealth in West Hartford and Bradley Foster & Sargent Inc in Hartford.
| Figure | Apella Wealth | Bradley Foster & Sargent Inc |
|---|---|---|
| Regulatory AUM | $11B | $9.1B |
| National rank | #86 | #114 |
| Headquarters | West Hartford, Connecticut | Hartford, Connecticut |
| Individual clients | 8,139 | 1,840 |
| High-net-worth clients | 3,591 | 1,013 |
| Average client assets | $1.3 million | $4.4 million |
| Accounts | 24,058 | 4,971 |
| Discretionary | 79% of AUM | 100% of AUM |
| Employees | 179 | 61 |
| Advisory staff | 88 | 32 |
| Clients per advisory employee | 92 | 58 |
| Offices | 38 | 9 |
| Form ADV filed | 2026-09-08 | 2026-04-06 |
Apella Wealth
Full profile →Services
- Financial planning
- Portfolio management for individuals and small businesses
How it’s paid
- A percentage of assets under management
- Other
Bradley Foster & Sargent Inc
Full profile →Services
- Financial planning
- Portfolio management for individuals and small businesses
- Portfolio management for investment companies
- Portfolio management for pooled investment vehicles
- Portfolio management for businesses and institutions
- Educational seminars and workshops
How it’s paid
- A percentage of assets under management
- Fixed fees
Questions
Which is bigger, Apella Wealth or Bradley Foster & Sargent Inc?
Apella Wealth, with $11B in regulatory assets under management against $9.1B at Bradley Foster & Sargent Inc. Nationally they rank #86 and #114 among 5,657 independent wealth management RIAs.
How many clients do Apella Wealth and Bradley Foster & Sargent Inc have?
Apella Wealth reports 8,139 individual clients (3,591 high-net-worth) with 88 advisory employees; Bradley Foster & Sargent Inc reports 1,840 (1,013 high-net-worth) with 32 advisory employees.
How do Apella Wealth and Bradley Foster & Sargent Inc charge clients?
Only Apella Wealth lists other forms of compensation on Form ADV. Only Bradley Foster & Sargent Inc lists fixed fees. Fee schedules and minimums are in each firm’s Form ADV Part 2A brochure.
What services do Apella Wealth and Bradley Foster & Sargent Inc offer?
Bradley Foster & Sargent Inc lists portfolio management for investment companies; portfolio management for pooled investment vehicles; portfolio management for businesses and institutions; educational seminars and workshops, which Apella Wealth does not. Both offer financial planning; portfolio management for individuals and small businesses.
More comparisons
- Apollon Wealth Management, LLC vs Apella Wealth $12B · $11B
- Perigon Wealth Management, LLC vs Apella Wealth $11B · $11B
- Apella Wealth vs Pure Financial Advisors, LLC $11B · $11B
- Apella Wealth vs Modern Wealth Management, LLC $11B · $11B
Where these numbers come from
Every figure is the firm’s own answer on its latest Form ADV, from the SEC’s registered-adviser list as of October 1, 2026: regulatory assets and accounts (Item 5.F), clients by type (5.D), employees (5.A and 5.B), compensation (5.E) and services (5.G). Average client assets divide the assets held for individual and high-net-worth clients by their number. Ranks compare each firm with all US-based independent wealth management RIAs, the same field as The Largest RIAs. Figures can lag recent deals and market moves.
Not an endorsement or a recommendation of either firm. Before hiring an adviser, read its Form ADV Part 2A brochure and check its record on the SEC’s adviser search: Apella Wealth ↗, Bradley Foster & Sargent Inc ↗. How to check a financial advisor →